Ethical Issues Raised by Needle Exchange Programs
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
- Vol. 23 (4) , 382-388
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.1995.tb01383.x
Abstract
United States public health experts have long expressed concern about the prevalence of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among injection drug users (IDUs). The United States has the largest reported IDU population in the world: 1.1 to 1.5 million. Recent estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggest that 50 percent of incident HIV infections occur among IDUs, with additional infections occurring among their sex partners and offspring. More than 33 percent of new AIDS cases occur in IDUs, their sexual partners, and their children. Almost one half of all women diagnosed with AIDS in the United States are IDUS. Many of the remaining infected women were infected as a result of sex with a male IDU.While public health agencies, legislators, community leaders, and religious groups have engaged in vigorous debate over the merits of needle exchange programs (NEPs) as an intervention to reduce HIV transmission, the programs, some legal and some illegal, have been implemented in fifty-five cities across the country.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A circulation theory of needle exchangeAIDS, 1994
- Evaluating needle exchangeAIDS, 1993
- Impact of a Needle Exchange Program on Potentially Infectious Syringes in Public PlacesJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 1992
- AIDS and Legal Access to Sterile Drug Injection EquipmentThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1992
- The Tacoma Syringe ExchangeJournal of Addictive Diseases, 1991
- Fear arousal and AIDSAIDS, 1990
- The impact of the needle and syringe-exchange programme in Amsterdam on injecting risk behaviourAIDS, 1989
- Prevalence of HIV infection in the USAAIDS, 1989
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987