Risk factors for treatment outcome of suspected microbial keratitis
Open Access
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 83 (9) , 1027-1031
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.9.1027
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary treatment for suspected microbial keratitis is generally successful. Although risks such as contact lens use are well recognised as causative factors for microbial keratitis, little is known about the risk factors that influence treatment outcome. The present study evaluates the risk factors assessed at diagnosis as prognostic indicators of primary treatment failure. METHODS Patients were prospectively enrolled in the ofloxacin treatment trial and data concerning symptoms, treatments, past and concurrent eye disease were collected along with the measurement of corneal ulcer size at the slit lamp. All patients were scraped for microbiological investigation, and treated with either ofloxacin (0.3%) or standard therapy of fortified cefuroxime and gentamicin drops. Treatment success was complete healing of the ulcer with zero dimensions of the epithelial defect within 2 weeks of start of treatment. The important prognostic indicators were selected by comparison among those who failed treatment, had delayed healing, or were culture positive with other patients using univariate and stratified analysis. These were then used in a Poisson model for multiple regression analysis to estimate the relative risk of the main prognostic variables. RESULTS Of the 118 patients enrolled in the study, 14 were identified as primary treatment failures, 17 had slow healing, and 15 indolent ulcers. There were 49 culture positive patients. The multivariate analysis identified that large culture positive ulcers in patients 60 years or older had 5.5 times the risk of primary treatment failure (pCONCLUSIONS Elderly patients with large ulcers were more likely to be culture positive, fail primary therapy, and require surgical intervention. A positive microbial culture provided prognostic information regardless of the organism isolated. However, this information was of less value for those with small ulcers and for younger patients.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empirical or Culture-Guided Therapy for Microbial Keratitis?Archives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1996
- The Role of Smears, Cultures, and Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing in the Management of Suspected Infectious KeratitisOphthalmology, 1996
- The Importance of Initial Management in the Treatment of Severe Infectious Corneal UlcersOphthalmology, 1995
- Efficacy of Ofloxacin vs Cefazolin and Tobramycin in the Therapy for Bacterial KeratitisArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1995
- 0.3% Ciprofloxacin Ophthalmic Ointment in the Treatment of Bacterial KeratitisArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1993
- Comparison of Topical Ciprofloxacin to Conventional Antibiotic Therapy in the Treatment of Ulcerative KeratitisAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1993
- Ultrastructural and Immunohistochemical Features of Coronal AdenomasAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1991
- Use of Corticosteroids in Combination with Antimicrobial Drugs in the Treatment of Infectious Corneal DiseaseOphthalmology, 1991
- Host, microbial, and pharmacological factors affecting the outcome of suppurative keratitis.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1987
- Demographic and Predisposing Factors in Corneal UlcerationArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1983