IARC Evaluations in the Light of Limitations of Human Epidemiologic Data
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 534 (1) , 44-54
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb30088.x
Abstract
Considerable human data are available that would causally associate human cancer with occupational exposures through the identification of substantial workplace risks. Much additional data are available, indicating lesser risks, that have not achieved widespread acceptance because of the limitations of epidemiologic techniques. Limitations of epidemiologic techniques also limit the associations that can be made, using general population data, between cancer mortality and occupation. These same uncertainties, however, also affect assertions of absence of effect. Apparently "negative" results must be evaluated with the same critical view as are most "positive" results.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research Issues in Occupational and Environmental CancerArchives of environmental health, 1984
- Occupational exposure to asbestos: Population at risk and projected mortality‐1980–2030American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1982
- Diagnostic Sensitivity Bias ??? An Epidemiologic Explanation for an Apparent Brain Tumor ExcessJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1981
- MORTALITY EXPERIENCE OF INSULATION WORKERS IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, 1943‐1976*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1979
- CORONARY HEART-DISEASE AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY OF WORKThe Lancet, 1953