Multiple comparisons and association selection in general epidemiology
Open Access
- 3 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 37 (3) , 430-434
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn064
Abstract
In this issue of the journal, Prof. Jon Wakefield provides a contribution to the complex topic of screening genetic associations.1 My comments here are intended to clarify some points and outline connections of his discussion to broader problems, describing how methods such as Wakefield's can be appropriate in epidemiology beyond genetic research. I will also comment on a few aspects of his presentation related to technical issues. I will assume (as does Wakefield) that the reader is familiar with the terminology of Bayesian statistics2 as well that of conventional (frequentist) statistics.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reporting and interpretation in genome-wide association studiesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research: I. Foundations and basic methodsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- Bayesians, Frequentists, and ScientistsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2005
- Calibration ofρValues for Testing Precise Null HypothesesThe American Statistician, 2001
- Multiple Comparisons and Related Issues in the Interpretation of Epidemiologic DataAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- p Values, Hypothesis Tests, and Likelihood: Implications for Epidemiology of a Neglected Historical DebateAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1993
- Empirical-Bayes Adjustments for Multiple Comparisons Are Sometimes UsefulEpidemiology, 1991
- No Adjustments Are Needed for Multiple ComparisonsEpidemiology, 1990
- Testing Statistical HypothesesPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- Bayesianly Justifiable and Relevant Frequency Calculations for the Applied StatisticianThe Annals of Statistics, 1984