Differences in Acquisition of Discrete Lever-Press and Shuttle Avoidance Responses in 6 Strains of Mice
Open Access
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Japanese Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 40 (2) , 303-310
- https://doi.org/10.1254/jjp.40.303
Abstract
Characteristics of the acquisition processes of discrete lever-press and shuttle avoidance responses (intertrial interval = 25 sec, warning duration = 5 sec with an escape contingency, and 1 session = 1 hr training/day) as well as those of the ambulatory activity were investigated in 6 strains of mice (dd, ICR, BALB/c, C57BL/6, C3H/He and DBA/2). In the lever-press avoidance situation, the dd, BALB/c and DBA/2 strains demonstrated a good avoidance response, showing average avoidance rates of higher than 80% within 10-15 sessions of the training. The C3H/He also demonstrated a good avoidance response, though 20 sessions or more of the training were required to attain to the level. The ICR and C57BL/6 strains demonstrated a poorer avoidance response than the other 4 strains, and achieved average avoidance rates of 30-40%. The dd, BALB/c, C3H/He and DBA/ 2 strains also demonstrated a good shuttle avoidance response when they were trained in an experimental box of 50 cm in width. In constrast, the ICR and C57BL/6 strains demonstrated an extremely poor avoidance response in this situation, showing an average avoidance rate of less than 10%. However, when the dd, ICR and C57BL/6 strains were trained in a shuttle box of 30 cm in width, they rapidly acquired the avoidance response, and the average avoidance rates finally achieved were much higher than those of the mice trained in the shuttle box of 50 cm in width. In particular, the C57BL/6 strain exhibited the best avoidance response among the 3 strains. The ambulatory activity of the C57BL/6 strain was less than those of the other 5 strains.This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparisons between Discrete Lever-Press and Shuttle Avoidance Responses in Mice: Acquisition Processes and Effects of Psychoactive DrugsThe Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, 1985
- Time of appearance during development of differences in nigrostriatal tyrosine hydroxylase activity in two inbred mouse strainsDevelopmental Brain Research, 1982
- Genetic variations in midbrain dopamine cell number: Parallel with differences in responses to dopaminergic agonists and in naturalistic behaviors mediated by central dopaminergic systemsBrain Research, 1981
- Simple and easy method for measurement of ambulatory activity in miceFolia Pharmacologica Japonica, 1978
- Effects of hippocampal electrical stimulation on long-term memory and on cholinergic mechanisms in three inbred strains of miceBrain Research, 1977
- Catecholamines: Strain differences in biosynthetic enzyme activity in miceLife Sciences, 1972
- Phenotypic and genetic relations between initial response to electric shock and rate of avoidance learning in miceBehavior Genetics, 1972
- Apparent memory differences in inbred mice produced by differential reaction to stress.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971
- GABA production, acetylcholinesterase activity and biogenic amine levels in brain for mouse strains differing in spontaneous activity and reactivityLife Sciences, 1970
- Inheritance of T-maze learning in mice.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970