Nonresponse Bias Due to Consent Procedures in School-Based, Health-Related Research
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by SAGE Publications in Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine
- Vol. 23 (1) , 53-59
- https://doi.org/10.1177/140349489502300110
Abstract
Written, parental consent was solicited from parents of 517 seventh grade students in four junior high schools in Bergen, Norway for their children's participation in a longitudinal nutrition education study. After having received several reminders, 97.3% of the parents gave their written consent. Students whose parents gave an immediate written consent reported more positive eating habits and were more likely to plan for college than were students whose parents responded after receiving one or more reminders. The observed differences did not severely bias our baseline estimates of these variables, and the magnitude of the observed intervention impact did not change as a result of excluding students whose parents were slow to respond. Excluding these students did, however, affect our ability to identify important factors associated with healthy eating behavior including socio-economic status. Subject selection bias may represent a threat to the validity of studies using a written parental consent procedure.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nutrition education in junior high schools: incorporating behavior change strategies into home economics coursesHealth Education Research, 1993
- Research ethics in nutrition educationJournal of Nutrition Education, 1992
- Rationale for the use of passive consent in smoking prevention research: Politics, policy, and pragmaticsPreventive Medicine, 1989
- ForskningsnotatAlkoholpolitik: Tidskrift för nordisk alkoholforskning (Alcohol Policy – Journal for Nordic Alcohol Research), 1988
- Sampling bias due to consent procedures with adolescentsAddictive Behaviors, 1983
- Sample Bias Resulting From a Requirement for Written Parental ConsentPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1983