Forthcoming ethical issues in biological psychiatry
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
- Vol. 6 (sup2) , 56-64
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15622970510030081
Abstract
Ethical issues in biological psychiatry are framed by (i) progress in the neurosciences, and (ii) a changing socio-cultural context. With regard to forthcoming neurotechniques to modify specifically defined brain functions by pharmacological substances with selective effects, by activating neuroplasticity including neurogenesis, or by implantation of neuronal tissues or computer-brain interfaces, etc., ethical problems will develop (i) at the border between therapy of diseases and enhancement of abilities in healthy people with regard to effects on society (e.g., social justice: equal access, loss of societal diversity) as well as on human value systems (e.g., personality, efforts, conditio humana), and (ii) at the border between the medical system and the wellness market with regard to financing what by whom? Ethical dilemmas in psychiatry develop (i) between the individual's best and the common good (demanded from outside medicine), (ii) among different ethical principles (inside medicine), iii) if solutions are influenced by personal reasons without observing ethical principles. Ethical guidelines are necessary for ethical orientation, but may protect against misconduct only (i) if psychiatrists are educated in ethics and (ii) if psychiatric acting is under continuous debate (by ethical review boards or the public). Thus, if we psychiatrists will become ethically sensitive by reflecting and perhaps solving our current ethical dilemmas we will be prepared to deal with forthcoming ethical issues in biological psychiatry.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general populationBMJ, 2004
- Biogerontologists' Duty to Discuss Timescales PubliclyAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2004
- Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2004
- Clinical implications of pharmacogenomics for tardive dyskinesiaThe Pharmacogenomics Journal, 2004
- An Ethical Assessment of Anti-Aging MedicineJournal of Anti-Aging Medicine, 2003
- Scientific misconduct: the state's role has limitsNature, 2002
- Financial Associations of AuthorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Protecting Research Subjects — What Must Be DoneNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Is Academic Medicine for Sale?New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. I: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment.Law and Human Behavior, 1995