Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint
Preprint
- 1 January 1999
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The government's incentives to bail out inefficient projects are determined by the trade-off between political benefits and economic costs, the latter depending on the decentralization of government. Two effects of federalism are derived: First, fiscal competition among local governments under factor mobility increases the opportunity costs of bailout and thus serves as a commitment device, (the "competition effect"). Second, monetary centralization, together with fiscal decentralization, induces a conflict of interests and thus may harden budget constraints and reduce inflation (the "checks and balance effect"). Our analysis is used to interpret China's recent experience of transition to a market economy.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Publications of János KornaiPublished by MIT Press ,2000
- Separation of Regulators against Collusive BehaviorThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1999
- From Federalism, Chinese Style, to Privatization, Chinese StyleSSRN Electronic Journal, 1997
- The Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment in ChinaThe World Economy, 1997
- Credit and Efficiency in Centralized and Decentralized EconomiesThe Review of Economic Studies, 1995
- Why is Capital so Immobile Internationally?: Possible Explanations and Implications for Capital Income TaxationPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1994
- Domestic savings and intra-national capital flowsEuropean Economic Review, 1993
- The Soft Budget ConstraintKyklos, 1986
- An Optimal Taxation Approach to Fiscal FederalismThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983
- Domestic Savings and International Capital FlowsPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1979