Prediction of Success in a Master's Degree Program in Nursing
- 1 June 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 42 (3) , 779-783
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1978.42.3.779
Abstract
This study examined the predictive validity of the Undergraduate Assessment Program (UP) Aptitude Test, Verbal and Quantitative scores, Remote Associates Test scores, Formula Analysis Test scores, and undergraduate grade-point average (GPA). Criterion variables consisted of Master's GPAs and faculty ratings of six student characteristics. Subjects were 52 students enrolled in the Graduate School at the University of Minnesota majoring in Nursing. Undergraduate GPA correlated .45 with Master's GPA and .35 with one faculty rating. Formula Analysis Test scores correlated from .45 to .70 with all six faculty ratings. Remote Associates Test scores and UP aptitude test verbal and quantitative scores did not correlate at a statistically significant level with any criterion measure. Results show undergraduate GPA to be a valid predictor of graduate success. Although the Formula Analysis Test scores showed predictive ability of faculty ratings, this research instrument requires further study before use as a graduate admissions measure.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential Utility of Predictors in Graduate Nursing EducationNursing Research, 1977
- Prediction of Success in an Applied M.A. Psychology ProgramEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
- The Relationship of the Graduate Record Examination to Grade Point Average and Success in Graduate SchoolEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
- Predicting Success in Graduate EducationScience, 1974
- THE GRADUATE RECORD EXAMINATION AS A PREDICTIVE POTENTIAL IN THE NURSING MAJORNursing Research, 1970
- Prediction of First-Year Graduate Success in Psychology: Peer RatingsThe Journal of Educational Research, 1969
- The Formula Analysis Test as a Predictor of Success in Graduate SchoolPsychological Reports, 1967