Human error models as predictors of accident scenarios for designers in road transport systems
- 1 October 1990
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 33 (10-11) , 1377-1387
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008925339
Abstract
Models of human error in technological systems have so far been used mainly retrospectively to explain accidents which have happened. Unless they can be used by designers of transport systems as prospective predictors of potential accident scenarios, their value as tools for accident prevention is limited. This paper reviews the theoretical and practical difficulties involved in closing the gap between human error models and the needs of transport system designers. The main conclusions are that cognitive psychologists should: (1) produce a pool of production rules which give an adequate description of driver behaviour in practice, plus a confusability index for those rules; and (2) document cases of erosion of rules by road users and develop a diagnostic tool for ‘susceptible’ rules.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Errors in routine driving tasks: a model and proposed analysis techniqueErgonomics, 1988
- A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do?Published by Springer Nature ,1985
- Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final reportPublished by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,1983
- A method for investigating human factor aspects of aircraft accidents and incidentsErgonomics, 1982