On the Renaissance of Personality Assessment and Personality Theory
- 1 October 1984
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Personality Assessment
- Vol. 48 (5) , 450-466
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4805_1
Abstract
Both personality assessment and personality theory have experienced a significant decline in the past two or three decades, giving way to alternate professional interests by some, and being attacked as both empirically unsupportable and devoid of conceptual merit by others. Several tangible signs suggest that a resurrection is underway owing to position reversals by former critics, the changing character of patient populations, refinements in personality-oriented psychometric techniques, the refurbishing of analytic, interpersonal, and learning theories of personality, and the central role assigned personality disorders in the multiaxial format of the DSM-III. Looking toward the future, the paper proposes a series of comprehensive and parallel diagnostic criteria for the personality disorders to be included in either DSM-IIIR or DSM-IV.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Convergences and challenges in the search for consistency.American Psychologist, 1984
- Meditation and somatic arousal reduction: A review of the experimental evidence.American Psychologist, 1984
- The diagnostic interview for borderline patientsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1981
- A comparison of borderline with depressed and schizophrenic patients on a new diagnostic interviewComprehensive Psychiatry, 1981
- A Note from the EditorComprehensive Psychiatry, 1981
- The future of clinical assessment.American Psychologist, 1981
- A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 1977
- Continuity and change in personality.American Psychologist, 1969
- DIAGNOSTIC TESTINGJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1967