Fundamental limitations in passive time delay estimation--Part I: Narrow-band systems
- 1 April 1983
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
- Vol. 31 (2) , 472-486
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tassp.1983.1164061
Abstract
Time delay estimation of a noise-like random signal observed at two or more spatially separated receivers is a problem of considerable practical interest in passive radar/sonar applications. A new method is presented to analyze the mean-square error performance of delay estimation schemes based on a modified (improved) version of the Ziv-Zakai lower bound (ZZLB). This technique is shown to yield the tightest results on the attainable system performance for a wide range of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions. For delay estimation using narrow-band (ambiguity-prone) signals, the fundamental result of this study is illustrated in Fig. 3. The entire domain of SNR is divided into several disjoint segments indicating several distinct modes of operation. If the available SNR does not exceed SNR1, signal observations from the receiver outputs are completely dominated by noise thus essentially useless for the delay estimation. As a result, the attainable mean-square error\bar{\epsilon}^{2}is bounded only by the a priori parameter domain. If SNR1< SNR < SNR2, the modified ZZLB coincides with the Barankin bound. In this regime differential delay observations are subject to ambiguities. If SNR > SNR3the modified ZZLB coincides with the Cramer-Rao lower bound indicating that the ambiguity in the differential delay estimation can essentially be resolved. The transition from the ambiguity-dominated mode of operation to the ambiguity-free mode of operation starts at SNR2and ends at SNR3. This is the threshold phenomenon in time delay estimation. The various deflection points SNRiand the various segments of the bound (Fig. 3) are given as functions of such important system parameters as time-bandwidth product (WT), signal bandwidth to center frequency ratio (W/ω0) and the number of half wavelengths of the signal center frequency contained in the spacing between receivers. With this information the composite bound illustrated in Fig. 3 provides the most complete characterization of the attainable system performance under any prespecified SNR conditions.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decentralization of the Gaussian maximum likelihood estimator and its applications to passive array processingIEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1981
- Time delay estimation for passive sonar signal processingIEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1981
- Delay estimation using narrow-band processesIEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1981
- The least squares estimation of time delay and its use in signal detectionIEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1978
- The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delayIEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1976
- Optimum signal processing for passive sonar range and bearing estimationThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975
- Bounds on Error in Signal Parameter EstimationIEEE Transactions on Communications, 1974
- Spectral Estimation of Time Delay for Dispersive and Non-Dispersive SystemsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1974
- Optimum processing for delay-vector estimation in passive signal arraysIEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1973
- Optimum Passive Bearing Estimation in a Spatially Incoherent Noise EnvironmentThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969