Antacid vs Sucralfate in Preventing Acute Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding in Abdominal Aortic Surgery
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 121 (7) , 810-812
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400070076016
Abstract
• We carried out a randomized, controlled trial of sucralfate vs antacid as prophylaxis against upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in 50 patients who had undergone abdominal aortic surgery. The groups were similar in age, sex, duration of prophylaxis, and number of risk factors per patient. No patient in the antacid group had upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. One patient in the sucralfate group had frank bleeding from the nasogastric tube; however, she also had a coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia. The bleeding stopped when these conditions were corrected. No complications occurred in the sucralfate group; five patients in the antacid group had minor complications. Sucralfate was as effective as antacid in this trial, and it resulted in a considerable saving in nursing time. (Arch Surg 1986;121:810-812)This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antacid Titration in the Prevention of Acute Gastrointestinal BleedingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Treatment of Hemorrhagic Gastritis by AntacidAnnals of Surgery, 1976
- ANTACID CONTROL OF COMPLICATIONS FROM ACUTE GASTRODUODENAL DISEASE AFTER BURNSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1976