Artefactual ST segment abnormalities due to electrocardiograph design.
- 1 August 1985
- Vol. 54 (2) , 121-128
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.54.2.121
Abstract
Specifications recommended for electrocardiographs omit any reference to phase characteristics and place undue emphasis on an extended amplitude response. This does not, however, ensure faithful reproduction of the electrocardiogram and may result in less effective attenuation of unwanted noise than can be achieved with modern filters. The separate effects of phase and amplitude response on electrocardiographic signals were compared, and it was shown that distortion of the electrocardiogram by equipment with an inadequate phase response may cause changes resembling those seen in ischaemic heart disease. Case reports are presented in which distortion produced by commercial equipment impeded diagnosis. Specifications recommended as standard for electrocardiographs should be modified to include phase response and allow greater attenuation of frequencies below 0.5 Hz.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transversal resonator digital filters: Fast and flexible online processors for biological signalsMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 1983
- Signal Distortion in the Electrocardiogram Due to Inadequate Phase ResponseIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1983
- Frequency response characteristics of ambulatory ECG monitoring systems and their implications for ST segment analysisAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Ambulatory ST segment monitoring. Problems, pitfalls, solutions, and clinical application.Heart, 1980
- A Simple Test for Phase Characteristics of Chart RecordersIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1979
- Effect of Random Frequency Modulation on ECG Power SpectraIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1979
- A Spectral Analysis of the Normal Resting ElectrocardiogramIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1973
- Analysis of power spectral densities of electrocardiogramsMathematical Biosciences, 1971
- Some Instrument-Induced Errors in the ElectrocardiogramJAMA, 1967
- The low-frequency response of electrocardiographs, a frequent source of recording errorsAmerican Heart Journal, 1966