A COMPARISON OF SIGNALED AND UNSIGNALED DELAY OF REINFORCEMENT
- 1 March 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 35 (2) , 145-152
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1981.35-145
Abstract
Pigeons were trained on either a variable‐interval 60‐second schedule, or on a schedule that differentially reinforced responses that were spaced at least 20 seconds apart. The birds were then exposed to several durations of reinforcement delay, with comparisons between signaled and unsignaled delays. Although unsignaled delays of 5 and 10 seconds produced large decreases in response rate, signaled delays of up to 10 seconds produced only moderate decreases in response rates. In addition, some subjects responded more rapidly with a .5 or 1.0 second duration of unsignaled delay than with immediate reinforcement. These response rate changes occurred regardless of whether the rate of reinforcement concomitantly decreased or increased.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- ON THE LAW OF EFFECT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970
- EFFECTS OF TIMEOUT ON SPACED RESPONDING IN PIGEONSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969
- The effect of delayed reinforcement on DRL performancePsychonomic Science, 1967
- VARIABLES DETERMINING THE EFFECTS OF DELAY IN REINFORCEMENT1,2Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1965
- The effect of delayed reinforcement on DRL conditioningPsychonomic Science, 1965
- EXTEROCEPTIVE CONTROL OF RESPONSE UNDER DELAYED REINFORCEMENTJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964
- PUNISHMENT OF TEMPORALLY SPACED RESPONDING1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963
- FREE‐OPERANT BEHAVIOR UNDER CONDITIONS OF DELAYED REINFORCEMENT. I. CRF‐TYPE SCHEDULESJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1960
- Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953
- The relation of secondary reinforcement to delayed reward in visual discrimination learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1948