How Malleable is the Eukaryotic Genome? Extreme Rate of Chromosomal Rearrangement in the GenusDrosophila
Open Access
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Genome Research
- Vol. 11 (2) , 230-239
- https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.162901
Abstract
During the evolution of the genusDrosophila, the molecular organization of the major chromosomal elements has been repeatedly rearranged via the fixation of paracentric inversions. Little detailed information is available, however, on the extent and effect of these changes at the molecular level. In principle, a full description of the rate and pattern of change could reveal the limits, if any, to which the eukaryotic genome can accommodate reorganizations. We have constructed a high-density physical map of the largest chromosomal element inDrosophila repleta(chromosome 2) and compared the order and distances between the markers with those on the homologous chromosomal element (3R) inDrosophila melanogaster. The two species belong to different subgenera (DrosophilaandSophophora, respectively), which diverged 40–62 million years (Myr) ago and represent, thus, the farthest lineages within theDrosophilagenus. The comparison reveals extensive reshuffling of gene order from centromere to telomere. Using a maximum likelihood method, we estimate that 114 ± 14 paracentric inversions have been fixed in this chromosomal element since the divergence of the two species, that is, 0.9–1.4 inversions fixed per Myr. Comparison with available rates of chromosomal evolution, taking into account genome size, indicates that theDrosophilagenome shows the highest rate found so far in any eukaryote. Twenty-one small segments (23–599 kb) comprising at least two independent (nonoverlapping) markers appear to be conserved betweenD. melanogasterandD. repleta. These results are consistent with the random breakage model and do not provide significant evidence of functional constraint of any kind. They support the notion that theDrosophilagenome is extraordinarily malleable and has a modular organization. The high rate of chromosomal change also suggests a very limited transferability of the positional information from theDrosophilagenome to other insects.[The sequence data described in this paper have been submitted to the GenBank data library under accession no,AF319441.]Keywords
This publication has 82 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Genome Sequence of Drosophila melanogasterScience, 2000
- Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programsNucleic Acids Research, 1997
- Inversion Length and Breakpoint Distribution in the Drosophila buzzatii Species Complex: Is Inversion Length a Selected Trait?Evolution, 1997
- Fab-7 functions as a chromatin domain boundary to ensure proper segment specification by the Drosophila bithorax complex.Genes & Development, 1996
- Toward a unified genetic map of higher plants, transcending the monocot–dicot divergenceNature Genetics, 1996
- Splits in fruitfly Hox gene complexesNature, 1996
- Comparative mapping reveals extensive linkage conservation—but with gene order rearrangements—between the pig and the human genomesGenomics, 1995
- Chromosomal Repatterning and Linkage Group Conservation in Mosquito Karyotypic EvolutionEvolution, 1994
- Nuclear DNA content of some important plant speciesPlant Molecular Biology Reporter, 1991
- Molecular evolution among someDrosophila species groups as indicated by two-dimensional electrophoresisJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1988