The Long-Run Effects of Tradeon Income and Income Growth
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- Published by International Monetary Fund (IMF) in IMF Working Papers
- Vol. 03 (37)
- https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451845594.001
Abstract
This paper examines the dynamic relationship between trade and income. While most economists agree that increased trade leads to an increase in average income, economic theory is ambiguous about the possible effects on the long-run growth rate of the economy. Using a dynamic panel data model, the hypotheses of no long-run effects of trade on income and on income growth are tested explicitly. The possibility of endogeneity is addressed by constructing an instrument for trade by extending Frankel and Romer's (1999) cross-sectional approach to the case of a panel data model. The empirical results indicate that trade has a large and significant effect on the level of income, but the effect on income growth is small and non-robust to model specification.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countriesPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Does trade raise income?Journal of International Economics, 2002
- Trade orientation, distortions and growth in developing countriesPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Does Trade Cause Growth?American Economic Review, 1999
- Openness and growth: A time-series, cross-country analysis for developing countriesJournal of Development Economics, 1996
- Equalizing Exchange: Trade Liberalization and Income ConvergenceThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993
- Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976-1985Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1992
- Economic Growth in a Cross Section of CountriesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991
- Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and TestingEconometrica, 1987
- Exports, policy choices, and economic growth in developing countries after the 1973 oil shockJournal of Development Economics, 1985