Degeneracy of the SU(3) Direct Product and the Symmetric Representations of SU(6)⊃SU(3)⊗SU(2)
- 1 June 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AIP Publishing in Journal of Mathematical Physics
- Vol. 11 (6) , 1885-1893
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1665340
Abstract
The relation between a state of U(n) associated with an m‐rowed Young diagram, m ≤ n, and a state of U(m) associated with an m‐rowed Young diagram provides the basis for the symmetric state of . As an application, the state vectors associated with the irreducible representations of SU (6) restricted to the subgroup are explicitly constructed for the symmetric representation, and generalized to the case of a 2‐rowed Young diagram. Expressions are given for the degeneracy of an state in SU (6), and the completeness of the obtained set of states is discussed. The direct product of symmetric states implies a direct product of SU (3) states; the operator which breaks the degeneracy of the ``2‐rowed'' state is shown to be Moshinsky's operator X which breaks the degeneracy of the SU (3) direct product.
Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Representations of U(4)⊃U(2)⊗U(2)Journal of Mathematical Physics, 1970
- Branching Rules for U(n)⊃SO(n)Journal of Mathematical Physics, 1970
- Internal-Labeling ProblemJournal of Mathematical Physics, 1969
- The U(n) ⊃ R(n) problem (I)Nuclear Physics, 1966
- A useful relation among Casimir operatorsPhysics Letters, 1965
- SU3 recoupling and fractional parentage in the 2s-1d shellNuclear Physics, 1965
- SU(6) and Electromagnetic InteractionsPhysical Review Letters, 1964
- Splitting of Spin-Unitary Spin SupermultipletsPhysical Review Letters, 1964
- On the Representations of the Rotation GroupReviews of Modern Physics, 1962
- Group theory of harmonic oscillators (II). The integrals of Motion for the quadrupole-quadrupole interactionNuclear Physics, 1961