Simple validatory tools for judging the predictive performance of parafac and three‐way PLS
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Chemometrics
- Vol. 6 (1) , 11-28
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1180060103
Abstract
The methods PARAFAC and three‐way PLS are compared with respect to their ability to predict reversed‐phase retention values. Special attention is paid to simple validatory tools, the meaning and use of which are explained.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methodological study applying three-mode factor analysis to three-way chemical data setsChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1990
- Aspects of the analysis of three-way dataChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1989
- Analysis of multi-way (multi-mode) dataChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1989
- An improved algorithm for the generalized rank annihilation methodJournal of Chemometrics, 1989
- Relationships between higher‐order data array configurations and problem formulations in multivariate data analysisJournal of Chemometrics, 1989
- Local principal component models, rank maps and contextuality for curve resolution and multi-way calibration inferenceChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1987
- Multi-way principal components-and PLS-analysisJournal of Chemometrics, 1987
- Principal Component AnalysisPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- Three-mode factor analysis of data on retention in normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatographyJournal of Chromatography A, 1984
- Regression DiagnosticsPublished by Wiley ,1980