Audit of postanal repair in the treatment of fecal incontinence
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 37 (4) , 369-372
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02053599
Abstract
The short-term results of postanal repair for idiopathic fecal incontinence are satisfactory but data on long-term outcome are lacking. This study was carried out to document the short-term and long-term results of this operation and to determine whether preoperative tests predict long-term outcome. Thirty-six patients (33 females; mean age, 57 years) with major idiopathic fecal incontinence operated on by one surgeon were studied. Patients had resting and voluntary contraction anal pressures and pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML) measured preoperatively. Symptoms were evaluated at 6 months after operation and again at a median of 25 (range, 6-72) months in all 36 patients. Symptoms were classified as: Group C, no improvement or worse; Group B, minor improvement; and Group A, marked improvement in comparison to the patient's preoperative symptoms. Seventeen patients had postoperative physiology performed. At 6 months there were 6 (17 percent) patients in Group C, 12 (33 percent) in Group B, and 18 (50 percent) in Group A. At final follow-up there were 17 (47 percent) in Group C, 9 (25 percent) in Group B, and 10 (28 percent) in Group A. Comparison of the preoperative data in the final outcome groups showed (mean±SE): Groups A and Bvs.Group C-resting pressure, 24.6±6 cm H2Ovs.40.5±12.2 (P=0.2), voluntary contraction pressure, 23.7±5.7vs.11.8±3.6 (P=0.09), and PNTML, 3.2±0.75 mSvs.3.3±0.99 (P=0.8). Mean differences between postoperative and preoperative results were: resting pressure, 28±8.2 cm H2O (P=0.003); voluntary contraction pressure, 19.5±6.7 (P=0.01); and PNTML, −0.3±0.29 mS (P=0.3). At 6 months 83 percent of patients had obtained some benefit from postanal repair but only 53 percent maintained this improvement with only 28 percent being markedly better. There was a trend toward a more favorable outcome in patients with greater squeezing pressures preoperatively but other tests were not of long-term predictive value.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The anal continence plug: a disposable device for patients with anorectal incontinenceThe Lancet, 1991
- Relation between rectal sensation and anal function in normal subjects and patients with faecal incontinence.Gut, 1990
- Clinical assessment and anorectal manometry before postanal repair: Failure to predict outcomeBritish Journal of Surgery, 1990
- Effect of postanal repair on progress of neurogenic damage to the pelvic floorBritish Journal of Surgery, 1990
- Critical assessment of the quality of continence after postanal repair for faecal incontinenceBritish Journal of Surgery, 1989
- Physiological changes after postanal repair and parameters predicting outcomeBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Delayed Rectal Sensation With Fecal IncontinenceGastroenterology, 1986
- Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinenceBritish Journal of Surgery, 1984
- Postanal repair for neuropathic faecal incontinence: Correlation of clinical result and anal canal pressuresBritish Journal of Surgery, 1983
- Anorectal IncontinenceProceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1975