Depth Perception in Pandora's Box and Size Illusion: Evolution with Age
- 1 April 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 12 (2) , 177-185
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p120177
Abstract
The aim of the experiment was to study the evolution with age (6, 8, 11 and 14 years) of pictorial depth perception in Pandora's box and to compare it with the evolution of size illusion with the same subjects and the same pictorial backgrounds. In addition to familiar size and relative position, each pictorial stimulus contained one or more of the following depth cues: linear perspective, texture gradient, and interposition. The two kinds of measurements produced different results. Size illusions, although present, did not vary with age but increased with the number of cues. Estimates of distance in Pandora's box increased with age and varied according to the type of cue present: texture gradient seemed to be critical to the amount of depth perceived. The correlation between size adjustments and distance adjustments was significant only for the two oldest groups of subjects (11 and 14 years).Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pictorial Perspective: Perception of Size, Linear, and Texture Perspective in Children and AdultsPerception, 1977
- The Ponzo IllusionJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1974
- Picture perception: Toward a theoretical model.Psychological Bulletin, 1974
- Development of sensitivity to static pictorial depth informationPerception & Psychophysics, 1973
- Pictorial Perception and CultureScientific American, 1972
- Hudson's Pictures in Pandora's BoxJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1970
- The 3D Reconstruction of a 2D Visual DisplayThe Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1969
- Visual IllusionsScientific American, 1968
- Two types of phenomenal instructions for size and distance judgments of objects presented on a two-dimensional planePerception & Psychophysics, 1967
- Pictorial Depth Perception in Sub-Cultural Groups in AfricaThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1960