The Suez Canal Dispute: A Case Study in Peaceful Settlement
- 1 January 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Organization
- Vol. 21 (1) , 79-101
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s002081830001314x
Abstract
If the United Nations system is to outlaw the unilateral use of force, except in cases of self-defense, it is clear that some provision must be made for the peaceful settlement of disputes and for peaceful change. In the past, peacekeeping operations have often succeeded in restoring a fragile peace. Yet collective actionall too frequently has been limited to a restoration of the status quo ante. Indeed, states have usuallyfailed to accept any collective responsibility to deal with the grievances that initially led to the outbreak of hostilities. If peace is to be maintained over any extended period of time, peacekeeping operations must not, asAmbassador Arthur J. Goldberg recently warned, “be a sofa to provide a comfortable respite from efforts atpeaceful settlement” but instead should “be a springboard for accelerated efforts to eliminate the root causes of conflict.”Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trust and suspicionJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1958
- Power and Law at SuezInternational Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 1956