Potential of Computer-aided Diagnosis to Reduce Variability in Radiologists’ Interpretations of Mammograms Depicting Microcalcifications
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 220 (3) , 787-794
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.220001257
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether computer-aided diagnosis can reduce interobserver variability in the interpretation of mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten radiologists interpreted mammograms showing clustered microcalcifications in 104 patients. Decisions for biopsy or follow-up were made with and without a computer aid, and these decisions were compared. The computer was used to estimate the likelihood that a microcalcification cluster was due to a malignancy. Variability in the radiologists’ recommendations for biopsy versus follow-up was then analyzed. RESULTS: Variation in the radiologists’ accuracy, as measured with the SD of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was reduced by 46% with computer aid. Access to the computer aid increased the agreement among all observers from 13% to 32% of the total cases (P < .001), while the κ value increased from 0.19 to 0.41 (P < .05). Use of computer aid eliminated two-thirds of the substantial disagreements in which two radiologists recomme...Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variability in the Interpretation of MammogramsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Gains in Accuracy from Replicated Readings of Diagnostic ImagesMedical Decision Making, 1992
- Improvement in Radiologists?? Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications on MammogramsInvestigative Radiology, 1990
- Some Practical Issues of Experimental Design and Data Analysis in Radiological ROC StudiesInvestigative Radiology, 1989
- Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic SystemsScience, 1988
- MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTICAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- ROC Methodology in Radiologic ImagingInvestigative Radiology, 1986
- Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960