ACCURACY OF PERFORMANCE ON A MATCHING‐TO‐SAMPLE PROCEDURE UNDER INTERVAL SCHEDULES1
- 1 July 1972
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 18 (1) , 65-77
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1972.18-65
Abstract
Correct matches on a matching-to-sample procedure were reinforced under fixed-interval, chained fixed-interval, and fixed-interval schedules with exteroceptive stimulus changes correlated with time since the last reinforcer (an added clock). For all four pigeons, accuracy changed within the fixed-interval and fixed-interval schedules with added clock, decreasing from the beginning of the interval to some point in the middle. The performance then became increasingly more accurate until the end of the interval. Under the chained schedules, accuracy also changed within the components. During the initial component, accuracy decreased from the beginning of the fixed interval to some point in the middle or at the end. During the middle component, the performance usually remained at an intermediate level of accuracy. During the terminal component, the initially inaccurate performance became increasingly more accurate throughout the interval. Systematic relationships between response rate and per cent error showed that all four pigeons performed most accurately at high rates. The accuracy of the performance at low rates was also quite high. These relationships held for all three types of schedules through an eight-fold variation in scheduled interreinforcement time.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- EFFECTS OF A CONDITIONED REINFORCER UPON ACCURACY OF MATCH‐TO‐SAMPLE BEHAVIOR IN PIGEONS1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970
- A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESPONDING MAINTAINED BY INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- Change stimulus sequences for discrimination tasks.Psychological Bulletin, 1967
- CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT IN SECOND‐ORDER SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1966
- THE EFFECT OF MULTIPLE SΔ PERIODS ON RESPONDING ON A FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULE: III. EFFECT OF CHANGES IN PATTERN OF INTERRUPTIONS, PARAMETERS AND STIMULI1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1965
- THE EFFECT OF MULTIPLE SΔ PERIODS ON RESPONDING ON A FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962
- AN EXPERIMENTAL OUTLINE FOR BUILDING AND EXPLORING MULTI‐OPERANT BEHAVIOR REPERTOIRESJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962
- INFLUENCE OF REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES ON RESPONSE DURATION1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961
- INTERMITTENT REINFORCEMENT OF MATCHING TO SAMPLE IN THE PIGEON1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1960
- Schedules of reinforcement.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1957