THE CORE EXECUTIVE AND THE RESIGNATION OF MRS THATCHER
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Public Administration
- Vol. 72 (3) , 341-363
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1994.tb01017.x
Abstract
Margaret Thatcher was seen as one of the most dominant post‐war Prime Ministers and yet she was forced to resign in November 1990. Most extant explanations of her fall concentrate on relatively short‐term factors such as the resignation of Sir Geoffrey Howe, the Community Charge and issues surrounding the European Community. This article argues that these accounts fail to explain Mrs Thatcher's fall because they do not place her resignation within the context of prime ministerial power. The article suggests that traditional notions of prime ministerial power are flawed because they are essentiallystatic and over‐simplistic. The article develops an alternative model of prime ministerial power based on the notion of power dependence. The model is then used to demonstrate that Mrs Thatcher's fall was due to her failure to recognize her dependence on cabinet colleagues.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS AND THE POLICY PROCESSPublic Administration, 1993
- Geotextile revetment filtersGeotextiles and Geomembranes, 1992
- British Government: The Central Executive TerritoryPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- Inheritance Before Choice in Public policyJournal of Theoretical Politics, 1990
- Mrs Thatcher and the power of the PMContemporary Record, 1990
- CORE EXECUTIVE STUDIES IN BRITAINPublic Administration, 1990
- REINTERPRETING THE WESTEAND AFFAIR: THEORIES OF THE STATE AND CORE EXECUTIVE DECISION MAKINGPublic Administration, 1990
- Mrs Thatcher's Approach to Leadership in Government: 1979-June 1983Parliamentary Affairs, 1983
- Iron Triangles, Woolly Corporatism and Elastic Nets: Images of the Policy ProcessJournal of Public Policy, 1981
- The Private Government of Public MoneyPublished by Springer Nature ,1981