Efficacy of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation in Patients with Different Clinical Risk Factors for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- 15 July 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Thoracic Society in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 164 (2) , 231-236
- https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.2.2011093
Abstract
In patients with acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a recent ARDS Network randomized controlled trial demonstrated that a low tidal volume (Vt) mechanical ventilation strategy (6 ml/kg) reduced mortality by 22% compared with traditional mechanical ventilation (12 ml/kg). In this study, we examined the relative efficacy of low Vt mechanical ventilation among 902 patients with different clinical risk factors for ALI/ARDS who participated in ARDS Network randomized controlled trials. The clinical risk factor for ALI/ARDS was associated with substantial variation in mortality. The risk of death (before discharge home with unassisted breathing) was highest in patients with sepsis (43%); intermediate in subjects with pneumonia (36%), aspiration (37%), and other risk factors (35%); and lowest in those with trauma (11%) (p < 0.0001). Despite these differences in mortality, there was no evidence that the efficacy of the low Vt strategy varied by clinical risk factor (p = 0.76, for interaction between ventilator group and risk factor). There was also no evidence of differential efficacy of low Vt ventilation in the other study outcomes: proportion of patients achieving unassisted breathing (p = 0.59), ventilator-free days (p = 0.58), or development of nonpulmonary organ failure (p = 0.44). Controlling for demographic and clinical covariates did not appreciably affect these results. After reclassifying the clinical risk factors as pulmonary versus nonpulmonary predisposing conditions and infection-related versus non-infection-related conditions, there was still no evidence that the efficacy of low Vt ventilation differed among clinical risk factor subgroups. In conclusion, we found no evidence that the efficacy of the low Vt ventilation strategy differed among clinical risk factor subgroups for ALI/ARDS. Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome; mechanical ventilators; acute lung injuryKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome: Frequency, clinical course, and costs of careCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- Current definitions of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome do not reflect their true severity and outcome.Intensive Care Medicine, 1999
- Improved prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome 15 years onIntensive Care Medicine, 1999
- Reduced Quality of Life in Survivors of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Compared With Critically Ill Control PatientsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1999
- Reduced mortality in association with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)Thorax, 1998
- Health-related quality of life and posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndromeCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Wall energy and wall thickness of exchange-coupled rare-earth transition-metal triple layer stacksJournal of Applied Physics, 1997
- Acid aspiration-induced lung injury in rabbits is mediated by interleukin-8-dependent mechanisms.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1995
- Recovery of function in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994
- Clinical Determinants of Abnormalities in Pulmonary Functions in Survivors of the Adult Respiratory Distress SyndromeAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1989