Use of an ER Audit to Build Recommendations for Improving Quality of Care: Part II: Follow-up to an ER Study
Open Access
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Healthcare Management Forum
- Vol. 13 (2) , 54-57
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0840-4704(10)60751-x
Abstract
Two years after presentation of recommendations to improve the quality and efficiency of the Emergency Room (ER), we systematically examined changes in the ER with respect to volumes, triage status, and waiting times. We also interviewed 10 key informants about their perceptions of the level of implementation of the recommendations. The results suggested that while some progress had been made, there was still considerable room for improvement and further recommendations were needed. The study highlights the importance of the follow-up process and the need for ongoing quality improvement in the ER.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- DiscussionThe Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1998
- Emergency department triage: A program assessment using the tools of continuous quality improvementThe Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- Continuous Quality Improvement Reduces Length of Stay for Fast‐track Patients in an Emergency DepartmentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Quality assurance in Canadian emergency departments: A national surveyThe Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- Report of an audit of nurse triage in an accident and emergency department.Emergency Medicine Journal, 1994
- A computerized audit of 15,009 emergency department recordsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1990