Managing a Low‐Incidence Risk: The Example of Toxic Shock Syndrome
- 1 March 1985
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 5 (1) , 73-84
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00153.x
Abstract
This article demonstrates a methodology that allows individuals to reach a personal decision on the use of products which carry very small risks to health and life but also offer considerable benefits. A combination of the principles of dominance, extended dominance, and various methods of direct risk-benefit tradeoffs are shown to reduce the number of possible decisions regarding product use to the one optimal for the value structure of a particular individual. An historical examination of toxic-shock syndrome identifies tampons as a product with risks too small to warrant public intervention but too sizeable to be ignored. The methodology described here can be applied for all such products.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toxic shock and tampons. Evaluation of the epidemiologic evidenceJAMA, 1982
- Risk factors for development of toxic shock syndrome. Association with a tampon brandPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1982
- Tri-State Toxic-Shock Syndrome Study. I. Epidemiologic FindingsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1982
- Protein Antigens from Staphylococcus aureus Strains Associated with Toxic-Shock SyndromeScience, 1981
- Toxic-Shock Syndrome in Menstruating WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Toxic-Shock SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- The Economic Value of Changing Mortality Probabilities: A Decision-Theoretic ApproachThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1980
- Rating the RisksEnvironment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 1979
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskEconometrica, 1979
- Social Benefit versus Technological RiskScience, 1969