Combination of Goldman Risk and Initial Cardiac Troponin I for Emergency Department Chest Pain Patient Risk Stratification
Open Access
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 8 (7) , 696-702
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00187.x
Abstract
Background: Accurate identification of low‐risk emergency department (ED) chest pain patients who may be safe for discharge has not been well defined. Goldman criteria have reliably risk‐stratified patients but have not identified any subset safe for ED release. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) values have also been shown to risk‐stratify patients but have not identified a subset safe for ED release. Objective: To test the hypothesis that ED chest pain patients with a Goldman risk of ≤4% and a single negative cTnI (≤0.3 ng/mL) at the time of ED presentation would be safe for discharge [Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed in which consecutive ED chest pain patients were enrolled from July 1999 to November 2000. Data collected included patient demographics, medical and cardiac history, electrocardiogram, and creatine kinase—MB and cTnI. Goldman risk stratification score was calculated while patients were still in the ED. Hospital course was followed daily. Telephone follow‐up occurred at 30 days. The main outcome was death, AMI, or revascularization (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/stents/coronary artery bypass grafting) within 30 days. Results: Of 2,322 patients evaluated, 998 had both a Goldman risk ≤4% and a cTnI ≤0.3 ng/mL. During the initial hospitalization, 37 patients met the composite endpoint (3.7%): 6 deaths (0.7%), 17 AMIs (1.7%), 18 revascularizations (1.8%). Between the time of hospital discharge and 30‐day follow‐up, 15 patients met the composite endpoint: 4 deaths (0.4%), 6 AMIs (0.6%), and 5 revascularizations (0.5%). Overall, 49 patients met the composite endpoint (4.9%; 95% CI = 3.6% to 6.2%): 10 deaths (1.0%; 95% CI = 0.4% to 1.6%); 23 AMIs (2.3%; 95% CI = 1.4% to 3.2%), and 23 revascularizations (2.3%; 95% CI = 1.4% to 3.2%) within 30 days of presentation. Conclusions: The combination of two risk stratification modalities for ED chest pain patients (Goldman risk ≤4% and cTnI ≤0.3 ng/mL) did not identify a subgroup of chest pain patients at <1% risk for death, AMI, or revascularization within 30 days.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chest Pain Centers: Diagnosis of Acute Coronary SyndromesAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2000
- Feasability of a Rapid Diagnostic Protocol for an Emergency Department Chest Pain UnitAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- Comprehensive Strategy for the Evaluation and Triage of the Chest Pain PatientAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- An Evaluation of Technologies for Identifying Acute Cardiac Ischemia in the Emergency Department: A Report from a National Heart Attack Alert Program Working GroupAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- Outcome of patients who were admitted to a new short-stay unit to “rule-out” myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Clinical characteristics and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients with initially normal or nonspecific electrocardiograms (a report from the Multicenter Chest Pain Study)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- A Computer Protocol to Predict Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Department Patients with Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency roomThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- A Predictive Instrument to Improve Coronary-Care-Unit Admission Practices in Acute Ischemic Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- A Computer-Derived Protocol to Aid in the Diagnosis of Emergency Room Patients with Acute Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982