Risk guidelines as a risk management tool
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Process Safety Progress
- Vol. 15 (4) , 213-218
- https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.680150407
Abstract
Quantitative risk analysis (QRA) is a valuable tool for understanding and managing risk in the chemical process industry. QRA is most useful when used to evaluate the impact of design alternatives on facility risk (comparing the risk of one design option to one or more alternatives). QRA also determines the major contributors to facility risk, so that efforts to manage and reduce that risk can be directed to areas where they will have the largest impact and be the most cost effective. However, it is inevitable that the use of a tool which generates a numerical estimate of risk will raise questions as to the tolerability of that estimated risk. The use of quantitative risk guidelines as one tool in the risk management process will be discussed.“Wise Men Foresee Calamity in Order the Better to Bear it.”—Attributed to King Arthur at his Coronation by Geoffrey of Monmouth (c. 1136) in Histoiria regum Britanniae[1]Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative risk assessment in EuropeProcess Safety Progress, 1995
- The Use of Quantitative Risk Assessment in the Continuing Risk Management of a Chlorine Handling FacilityPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- Risk analysis and risk policy in the Netherlands and the EECJournal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1991
- A major accident prevention programPlant/Operations Progress, 1990
- Quantitative risk analysis in the chemical process industryReliability Engineering & System Safety, 1990
- Use of quantified risk assessment techniques in relation to major hazard installationsCryogenics, 1988
- Risk Assessment and Comparisons: An IntroductionScience, 1987
- Perception of RiskScience, 1987
- Hazard analysis—A review of criteriaReliability Engineering, 1982
- Calculated process risks and hazards managementPlant/Operations Progress, 1982