Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Platelet Inhibition With Eptifibatide, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
- 22 February 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 101 (7) , 751-757
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.7.751
Abstract
Background —Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists prevent the composite end point of death or myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes. There is uncertainty about whether this effect is confined to patients who have percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) and whether PCIs further prevent death or MI in patients already treated with GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. Methods and Results —PURSUIT patients were treated with the GP IIb/IIIa antagonist eptifibatide or placebo; PCIs were performed according to physician practices. In 2253 of 9641 patients (23.4%), PCI was performed by 30 days. Early (P =0.001), MI preceded early PCI. In patients censored for PCI across the 30-day period, there was a significant reduction in the primary composite end point in eptifibatide patients ( P =0.035). Eptifibatide reduced 30-day events in patients who had early PCI (11.6% versus 16.7%, P =0.01) and in patients who did not (14.6% versus 15.6%, P =0.23). After adjustment for PCI propensity, there was no evidence that eptifibatide treatment effect differed between patients with or without early PCI ( P for interaction=0.634). PCI was not associated with a reduction of the primary composite end point but was associated with a reduced (nonspecified) composite of death or Q-wave MI. This association disappeared after adjustment for propensity for early PCI. Conclusions —Eptifibatide reduced the composite rates of death or MI in PCI patients and those managed conservatively.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes in Patients with Acute Non–Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction Randomly Assigned to an Invasive as Compared with a Conservative Management StrategyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- A Comparison of Aspirin plus Tirofiban with Aspirin plus Heparin for Unstable AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Inhibition of the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor with Tirofiban in Unstable Angina and Non–Q-Wave Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Evidence for Prevention of Death and Myocardial Infarction With Platelet Membrane Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade by Abciximab (c7E3 Fab) Among Patients With Unstable Angina Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary RevascularizationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery diseaseThe Lancet, 1990
- Aspirin, Heparin, or Both to Treat Acute Unstable AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Coronary angioplasty for unstable angina: Immediate and late results in 200 consecutive patients with identification of risk factors for unfavorable early and late outcomeJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity ScoreJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity ScoreJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983