Public Report Cards — Cardiac Surgery and Beyond
- 2 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 355 (18) , 1847-1849
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp068222
Abstract
The debate about public report cards for physicians and hospitals never seems to end.1 Some praise report cards for their role in improving the quality of care, patient safety, and the choices of patients, referring physicians, and organizations that purchase health care. Others argue that such reports can have negative consequences — for example, if physicians or hospitals, in order to protect their rankings, avoid performing surgery on severely ill patients for whom surgical treatment might otherwise be recommended. Nonetheless, more and more data are being collected and released, although policies regarding the public availability of information vary widely. Thirty-seven . . .Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Predictive Accuracy Of The New York State Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Report-Card SystemHealth Affairs, 2006
- The Unintended Consequences of Publicly Reporting Quality InformationJAMA, 2005
- Provider Profiling and Quality Improvement Efforts in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryMedical Care, 2003
- Is More Information Better? The Effects of “Report Cards” on Health Care ProvidersJournal of Political Economy, 2003
- Hospital Quality In CaliforniaHealth Affairs, 1988