Would you rather be a 'birth' or a 'genetic' mother? If so, how much?
Open Access
- 1 June 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 20 (2) , 87-92
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.20.2.87
Abstract
Judges face difficult choices when the birth and genetic mothers of a child are separate people who dispute maternal access; the views of the general population may help them. Fifty women were asked whether, if they were infertile and could have only one child, they would prefer to be birth mothers (to carry a baby which was not genetically theirs) or genetic mothers (to have another woman carry their genetic baby). Similarly, fifty men were asked about their preference for a partner's child. In both groups the strength of preferences was measured using a lottery technique. The direction and strength of preferences was similar between men and women, and approximately equally divided between birth and genetic motherhood. These attitudes should be taken into account by those adjudicating custody disputes between such mothers.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decision analysis in medicine.BMJ, 1992
- Using Genes to Define Motherhood — The California SolutionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Which of two individuals do you treat when only their ages are different and you can't treat both?Journal of Medical Ethics, 1989
- Gifts of Gametes: reflections about surrogacyJournal of Applied Philosophy, 1986