Evaluation and Comparison of the TDXII, Stratus, and OPUS Digoxin Assays

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Three automated immunoassays for digoxin in serum were evaluated--Abbott TDxII, Baxter Stratus, and Behring OPUS. The accuracy and precision of the assays were assessed by weighed-in controls and an external quality control program. Coefficients of variation of all methods in serum were < or = 10% at weighed-in concentrations of digoxin of 1 and 2.5 micrograms/L. Accuracy relative to weighed-in concentrations of 1 and 2.5 micrograms/L ranged from 98 to 126% for all methods. Comparative results from patient samples showed little difference between the TDxII and Stratus and a greater difference observed between the TDxII and OPUS assays. The detection of digoxin-free samples containing digoxin-like immunoreactive substances (DLIS) in neonatal cord blood, pregnant patients, and liver and renal recipients by each assay was then assessed. The TDxII exhibited the highest incidence of DLIS. This is evident in neonatal cord blood in which 40.4% of samples tested positive. In comparison, the extent of DLIS detected by Stratus was less and OPUS exhibited no DLIS in any of the groups studied. A case study of a patient treated with anti-digoxin Fab fragments (Digibind) also was included for analysis by each method. Fourteen hours after Digibind administration, the TDxII registered a digoxin concentration of 49.5 micrograms/L compared with 3.73, 1.80, and 2.49 micrograms/L for Stratus, OPUS, and ultrafiltered TDxII methods, respectively. The results indicate that to determine the concentration of digoxin after the administration of Digiband, the OPUS or fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA)-ultrafiltered samples by TDxII are the assays of choice.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: