Cold water, ultra-high pressure cleaning of abattoirs
- 1 February 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Epidemiology and Infection
- Vol. 78 (1) , 11-16
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s002217240005587x
Abstract
SUMMARY: Cold water (10° C) at ultra-high pressure (38·5–49 kg/cm2) was compared with (a) hot water (65·6–82·2° C) at low pressure (4·2–5·6 kg/cm2) and (b) hot water containing a detergent (2% (w/v) sodium silicate). Seven sites were examined in a beef abattoir and six in a bacon factory.Three surfaces in the beef abattoir had lower residual colony counts (higher reductions) after hot water/low pressure than after cold water/high pressure. However, the differences were not significant (P> 0·05). The range of the mean log10count/cm2before cleaning was 4·02–5·15, and after cleaning 1·73–2·32 (hot water) and 1·9–2·85 (cold water).On three of the remaining sites, the three methods were compared. The total differences between treatments were not significant (P> 0.05), although there was an effect of surface and an interaction between surface and treatment. The cold water produced lower residual counts on three sites in the bacon factory than the hot water (45–54°C). However, the differences were not significant on the remaining surfaces.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use of Semi-automatic Pipettes in the Viable Counting of BacteriaJournal of Applied Bacteriology, 1973
- A note on the hygiene of meat mincing machinesEpidemiology and Infection, 1973
- Microbiological assessment of surfacesInternational Journal of Food Science & Technology, 1971
- An evaluation of the efficiency of cleaning methods in a bacon factoryEpidemiology and Infection, 1971