The inter‐rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Montgomery–Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) using a structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA)
- 24 February 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental
- Vol. 19 (3) , 187-192
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.576
Abstract
The inter‐rater reliability of the Japanese version of MADRS (MADRSJ) was examined using the structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA) developed by our group. Two or more psychiatrists attended the systematic interview sessions with each subject to evaluate MADRSJ independently, using SIGMA. A total of 18 interviews was carried out for seven patients with DSM‐IV major depressive disorder. The severity of each item assessed by the raters ranged from 0 to 6 for nine items and from 0 to 4 for one item. The analysis of variance intraclass correlation coefficient inter‐rater reliability values for the individual items carried out by two trained personnel ranged from 0.91 to 1.00, while those achieved by three raters ranged from 0.85 to 1.00. The present results suggest that SIGMA is a potentially useful interview guide for assessing ten symptoms of MADRSJ precisely in patients with a depressive disorder. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validación de las versiones en español de la Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale y la Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale para la evaluación de la depresión y de la ansiedadMedicina Clinica, 2002
- Comparison of the Standard and Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in Depressed Geriatric InpatientsAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2001
- A structured interview guide increases Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale reliability in raters with low clinical experienceActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2001
- Hamilton anxiety rating scale interview guide: Joint interview and test-retest methods for interrater reliabilityPsychiatry Research, 1994
- A Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating ScaleArchives of General Psychiatry, 1988
- The Montgomery‐Åsberg Depression Scale: reliability and validityActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1986
- Inter‐rater reliability of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale in JapanActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1985
- A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to ChangeThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1979
- RELIABILITY OF THE CPRS BETWEEN THE DISCIPLINES OF PSYCHIATRY, GENERAL PRACTICE, NURSING AND PSYCHOLOGY IN DEPRESSED PATIENTSActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1978
- A COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHOPATHOLOGICAL RATING SCALEActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1978