Cutaneous Reaction to an Epoxy-Coated Pacemaker
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Dermatology
- Vol. 115 (1) , 97-98
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1979.04010010065021
Abstract
Cutaneous reactions to implanted materials occur, but implanted cardiac pacemakers rarely have been suspected as the triggering agent. Raque and Goldschmidt1 described a patient with circumscribed eczematous dermatitis occurring over the site of a pacemaker within three weeks of implantation. Later, widespread nummular eczema developed. The authors discussed whether it was an irritant dermatitis due to a medicalgrade silicone elastomer or nummular eczema provoked by an irritant dermatitis. Patch tests in a patient and two control subjects with the uncured silicone adhesive gave positive reactions that were thought to be irritant reactions. The patient's dermatitis improved even though the pacemaker was not removed. Recently I suspected a patient to have "pacemaker dermatitis." The cause relationship seemed clear, but the mechanism did not. Report of a Case A 65-year-old man with Stokes-Adams syndrome had an epoxy-coated pacemaker (Medtronic) implanted subcutaneously in the right infraclavicular region in December 1975. There wasThis publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simple methods for demonstration of epoxy resins of bisphenol A typeContact Dermatitis, 1978
- Cross‐reactions between ethylenediamine, diethylenetriamine and triethylenetetramineContact Dermatitis, 1976
- Dermatitis associated with an implanted cardiac pacemakerArchives of Dermatology, 1970
- The SLS Provocative Patch Test in Allergic Contact SensitizationJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 1966