Unraveling in Democratically Governed Groups
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Rationality and Society
- Vol. 2 (1) , 4-34
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463190002001002
Abstract
This essay presents a framework for the analysis of voting processes in interest group organizations. It explores the tension between majority rule and membership maintenance in a group. The major theoretical propositions are that myopic majority rule government can cause instability and a loss of members from the group. The risk of this instability, which is called unraveling, leads to behavioral and institutional solutions that impose nonmedian social choices on the group members. The theory is applied to the founding era of the American Federation of Labor, an important, long-lived organization. It is shown that the most important features of the AFL in this century are best explained by reference to the theory of social choice in voluntary organizations.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Foresight and Myopia in Organizational MembershipThe Journal of Politics, 1987
- Strong tiebout equilibrium under restricted preferences domainJournal of Economic Theory, 1986
- A Downsian Spatial Model with Party ActivismAmerican Political Science Review, 1983
- A dynamic model of protocoalition formation in ideologicaln-spaceBehavioral Science, 1982
- A Critique of Tiebout's Theory of Local Public ExpendituresEconometrica, 1981
- Threshold Models of Collective BehaviorAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1978
- Collective action as an agreeable n-prisoners' dilemmaBehavioral Science, 1971
- Dynamic models of segregation†The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1971
- An Exchange Theory of Interest GroupsMidwest Journal of Political Science, 1969
- The Spirit of Private GovernmentAmerican Political Science Review, 1958