Estimating the Standardized Mean Difference in Intervention Studies
- 1 December 1988
- journal article
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Journal of Educational Statistics
- Vol. 13 (4) , 337-350
- https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986013004337
Abstract
Methods for approximating confidence intervals for the population standardized mean difference, δ , were evaluated analytically in small samples. A procedure based on the large sample approximation of the distribution of the sample standardized mean difference d was quite accurate over most of the range .25 ≤ δ ≤1.5 and 6 ≤ N ≤ 40 examined. Use of Hedges’s adjustment to d yielded confidence intervals that were slightly conservative, whereas the unadjusted d produced intervals that were somewhat liberal. An empirically determined simple linear adjustment to d demonstrated the most consistent precision when used to construct confidence intervals for δ , having a maximum error of less than 2% of the nominal level of confidence over the effect size range of most interest to behavioral scientists.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimation of a Single Effect Size: Parametric and Nonparametric MethodsPublished by Elsevier ,1985
- Theory of Estimation and Testing of Effect Sizes: Use in Meta-AnalysisJournal of Educational Statistics, 1983
- Theory of Estimation and Testing of Effect Sizes: Use in Meta-AnalysisJournal of Educational Statistics, 1983
- Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments.Psychological Bulletin, 1982
- Comparing effect sizes of independent studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1982
- Representations of the central and non-central t distributionsBiometrika, 1964
- Normalizing the Noncentral $t$ and $F$ DistributionsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1960
- RELATION BETWEEN THE DISTRIBUTIONS OF NON-CENTRAL t AND OF A TRANSFORMED CORRELATION COEFFICIENTBiometrika, 1957
- APPLICATIONS OF THE NON-CENTRAL t-DISTRIBUTIONBiometrika, 1940