Identification of coryneform and other Gram‐positive rods with several methods

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The identification of 202 isolates of aerobically growing Gram-positive rods from clinical material was attempted by using a combination of "traditional" morphological and biochemical tests (Hollis & Weaver (20)) plus patterns of cellular and metabolic fatty acids. This system served as the "gold standard" for three others, i.e. API Coryne (Rapid Coryne), MIDI TSBA and MIDI CLIN Aerobic. In addition, several growth, biochemical and susceptibility tests (growth on cystine-tellurite blood agar, DNase, hippurate and starch hydrolysis, methanethiol formation, API ZYM, CAMP reaction, susceptibility to O/129 and to six antimicrobials) were done in order to check their usefulness for the identification of this group of bacteria. Our system, with the help of chemotaxonomic tests (m-DAP and mycolic acids), was able to identify 154/202 (76%) of the isolates by species and an additional 41/202 (21%) by genus only; 7 (3%) could not be identified. The API Coryne system identified to species or genus level 140/195 isolates (72%). Corresponding figures for the MIDI TSBA and CLIN systems were 63/195 (32%) and 88/195 (45%); further details of species and genus identification are presented in the text. The main drawback of the commercial systems is the extent and probably the numerical depth of the data base. We recommend the use of our multisystem approach for the identification of Gram-positive rods until commercial systems are based on a broader and numerically more extensive data base. The additional tests did not prove species- or genus-specific.

This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit: