Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 11 August 2009
- journal article
- the plos-medicine-debate
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 6 (8) , e1000086
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000086
Abstract
The UK Medical Research Council defines complex interventions as those comprising “a number of separate elements which seem essential to the proper functioning of the interventions although the ‘active ingredient’ of the intervention that is effective is difficult to specify.” A typical example is specialist care on a stroke unit, which involves a wide range of health professionals delivering a variety of treatments. Michelle Campbell and colleagues have argued that there are “specific difficulties in defining, developing, documenting, and reproducing complex interventions that are subject to more variation than a drug” [10]. These difficulties are one of the reasons why it is challenging for researchers to systematically review complex interventions and synthesize data from separate studies. This PLoS Medicine Debate considers the challenges facing systematic reviewers and suggests several ways of addressing them.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical service organisation for heart failureCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012
- Protocol for the PINCER trial: a cluster randomised trial comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management in general practicesTrials, 2009
- Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient dataCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2009
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2008
- Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmesBMJ, 2007
- Patient Adherence to Tuberculosis Treatment: A Systematic Review of Qualitative ResearchPLoS Medicine, 2007
- A review of health behaviour theories: how useful are these for developing interventions to promote long-term medication adherence for TB and HIV/AIDS?BMC Public Health, 2007
- Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventionsJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Comprehensive Discharge Planning With Postdischarge Support for Older Patients With Congestive Heart FailureJAMA, 2004