RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF TACROLIMUS (PROGRAF) IN COMBINATION WITH AZATHIOPRINE OR MYCHOPHENOLATE MOFETIL VERSUS CYCLOSPORINE (NEORAL) WITH MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL AFTER CADAVERIC KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION1, 2
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 69 (5) , 834-841
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200003150-00028
Abstract
Our clinical trial was designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants for renal transplantation. A randomized three-arm, parallel group, open label, prospective study was performed at 15 North American centers to compare three immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus + azathioprine (AZA) versus cyclosporine (Neoral) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus tacrolimus + MMF. All patients were first cadaveric kidney transplants receiving the same maintenance corticosteroid regimen. Only patients with delayed graft function (32%) received antilymphocyte induction. A total of 223 patients were randomized, transplanted, and followed for 1 year. There were no significant differences in baseline demography between the three treatment groups. At 1 year the results are as follows: acute rejection 17% (95% confidence interval 9%, 26%) in tacrolimus + AZA; 20% (confidence interval 11%, 29%) in cyclosporine + MMF; and 15% (confidence interval 7%, 24%) in tacrolimus + MMF. The incidence of steroid resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy was 12% in the tacrolimus + AZA group, 11% in the cyclosporine + MMF group, and 4% in the tacrolimus + MMF group. There were no significant differences in overall patient or graft survival. Tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower incidence of hyperlipidemia through 6 months posttransplant. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus requiring insulin was 14% in the tacrolimus + AZA group, 7% in the cyclosporine + MMF and 7% in the tacrolimus + MMF groups. All regimens yielded similar acute rejection rates and graft survival, but the tacrolimus + MMF regimen was associated with the lowest rate of steroid resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF TWO FORMULATIONS OF CYCLOSPORINE: NEORAL AND SANDIMMUNETransplantation, 1999
- A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF TACROLIMUS/PREDNISONE VERSUS TACROLIMUS/PREDNISONE/MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS*Transplantation, 1999
- Tacrolimus/“low-dose” mycophenolate mofetil versus microemulsion cyclosporine/“low-dose” mycophenolate mofetil after kidney transplantation—1-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized clinical trialTransplantation Proceedings, 1999
- Assessment of the frequency and costs of posttransplantation hospitalizations in patients receiving tacrolimus versus cyclosporineAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1998
- Co-administration of Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Cadaveric Renal Transplant RecipientsTransplantation Proceedings, 1998
- FK 506 and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Transplant Recipients: Six-Month Results of a Multicenter, Randomized Dose Ranging TrialTransplantation Proceedings, 1998
- MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING TACROLIMUS (FK506) AND CYCLOSPORINE IN THE PREVENTION OF RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION1Transplantation, 1997
- A COMPARISON OF TACROLIMUS (FK506) AND CYCLOSPORINE FOR IMMUNOSUPPRESSION AFTER CADAVERIC RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1Transplantation, 1997
- A BLINDED, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL OF MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACUTE REJECTION IN CADAVERIC RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1Transplantation, 1996
- MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACUTE REJECTION IN PRIMARY CADAVERIC RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1995