Breakpoints for Susceptibility Testing Should Not Divide Wild-Type Distributions of Important Target Species
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 53 (4) , 1628-1629
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01624-08
Abstract
The fluconazole MIC distributions for Candida glabrata from testing 34 different clinical isolates and performing 51 tests on a single isolate mirrored each other. Since what is perceived as biological variation in isolates without resistance mechanisms is mainly methodological variation, breakpoints which divide this distribution not only lack a sound biological basis but also result in poor reproducibility of susceptibility characterization. This makes 2, 4, 8, and possibly 16 μg/ml unsuitable breakpoints for C. glabrata and fluconazole.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- EUCAST Definitive Document EDef 7.1: method for the determination of broth dilution MICs of antifungal agents for fermentative yeastsClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2008
- EUCAST Technical Note on fluconazoleClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2008
- European harmonization of MIC breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteriaJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2003