Good Blood, Bad Blood, and the Market: The Gift Relationship Revisited
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Public Policy
- Vol. 6 (4) , 431-445
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00004232
Abstract
The Gift Relationship (Titmuss, 1970) argued that the UK system of voluntary blood donation was economically, medically, and morally superior to the American system, in which many blood suppliers are paid. The argument was badly put and fiercely attacked, but substantially correct. Developments since Titmuss wrote, especially AIDS, have tragically reinforced his main point: more than half of the severe haemophiliacs in the UK have been infected with the AIDS virus, almost certainly through imported blood products. Titmuss's normative argument is reconstructed, and defended against neoclassical economists who have been his fiercest critics. Finally, policy implications are briefly discussed.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevalence of antibody to HTLV-III in haemophiliacs in the United Kingdom.BMJ, 1986
- Retrovirus infections among patients treated in Britain with various clotting factors.BMJ, 1986
- Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire batNature, 1984
- Gifts and ExchangesPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1982
- Community, Anarchy and LibertyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1982
- The Evolution of CooperationScience, 1981
- Factor VIII supply and demand.BMJ, 1980
- A review of blood donor motivation and recruitmentTransfusion, 1977
- Tort Liability for Hepatitis: An Analysis and a ProposalStanford Law Review, 1972
- The Evolution of Reciprocal AltruismThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1971