Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Detection: Comparison of Two Molecular Methods (IDI-MRSA PCR Assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR Assay) with Three Selective MRSA Agars (MRSA ID, MRSA Select , and CHROMagar MRSA) for Use with Infection-Control Swabs
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 45 (8) , 2486-2490
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00139-07
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an increasing problem. Rapid detection of MRSA-colonized patients has the potential to limit spread of the organism. We evaluated the sensitivities and specificities of MRSA detection by two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) and three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA), using 205 (101 nasal, 52 groin, and 52 axillary samples) samples from consecutive known MRSA-infected and/or -colonized patients. All detection methods had higher MRSA detection rates for nasal swabs than for axillary and groin swabs. Detection of MRSA by IDI-MRSA was the most sensitive method, independent of the site (94% for nasal samples, 80% for nonnasal samples, and 90% overall). The sensitivities of the GenoType MRSA Direct assay and the MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA agars with nasal swabs were 70%, 72%, 68%, and 75%, respectively. All detection methods had high specificities (95 to 99%), independent of the swab site. Extended incubation for a further 24 h with selective MRSA agars increased the detection of MRSA, with a corresponding decline in specificity secondary to a significant increase in false-positive results. There was a noticeable difference in test performance of the GenoType MRSA Direct assay in detection of MRSA (28/38 samples [74%]) compared with detection of nonmultiresistant MRSA (17/31 samples [55%]) (susceptible to two or more non-beta-lactam antibiotics). This was not observed with selective MRSA agar plates or IDI-MRSA. Although it is more expensive, in addition to rapid turnaround times of 2 to 4 h, IDI-MRSA offers greater detection of MRSA colonization, independent of the swab site, than do conventional selective agars and GenoType MRSA Direct.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a New Chromogenic Medium, MRSA Select , for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- Direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical specimens by a nucleic acid-based hybridisation assayClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2006
- Performance of CHROMagar MRSA Medium for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005
- Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Nasal Swab Specimens by a Real-Time PCR AssayJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Genetic Diversity among Community Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Causing Outpatient Infections in AustraliaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- New Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid Detection of Methicillin- ResistantStaphylococcus aureusDirectly from Specimens Containing a Mixture of StaphylococciJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Community‐Acquired Methicillin‐ResistantStaphylococcus aureus:A Meta‐Analysis of Prevalence and Risk FactorsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- The Economic Impact of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian HospitalsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2001
- Effectiveness of Contact Isolation during a Hospital Outbreak of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureusAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Sensitivity of surveillance cultures for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a nursing-home-care unitDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1993