Automation, Task Difficulty, and Aircrew Performance
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Military Psychology
- Vol. 10 (4) , 259-274
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1004_3
Abstract
The effects of an automated system on team processes and performance were assessed in a laboratory simulation. Two-person crews were required to fly a complex emergency-response scenario under conditions of low and high workload. These flights were completed with or without the aid of an autopilot. The results indicated that the autopilot was effective in reducing subjective workload. However, the automation was associated with improved performance on only 1 of 4 performance measures. Furthermore, it was observed that problem-solving performance was worse in the autopilot condition during the high-workload flights. Investigation of crew process data indicated that workload savings afforded by the autopilot might have been invested in more explicit coordination. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for military aviators' performance, system design, and team training.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automation and Crew Performance: The Importance of Who and WhatProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1996
- Games teams play: A method for investigating team coordination and performanceBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1992
- The Study of Crew Coordination and Performance in Hierarchical Team Decision MakingPublished by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ,1992
- Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical ResearchPublished by Elsevier ,1988
- Ironies of automationAutomatica, 1983
- Advanced Commercial Cockpit ConceptsSAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility, 1982
- The Pilot and the Flight Management SystemSAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility, 1982
- Role of verbal communication in teamwork.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1966
- The Impact of Numerically Controlled Equipment on Factory OrganizationCalifornia Management Review, 1964