Neo-Idealism: A Practical Matter
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Ethics & International Affairs
- Vol. 2, 173-197
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.1988.tb00534.x
Abstract
The classical realist world view places moral standards subservient to the power concerns of international actors. Realists did not make this valuation without some hesitation, as the issue of morality was addressed with seriousness and concern. The neo-realist thinking of today embraces with less hesitation the ultimate conclusion of the realist premises: statesmen never act according to moral precepts, thus such concerns need not be addressed by a political theory. Kegly argues the neo-idealist position that opposes this empirical observation: states consistently act according to values that are based on more than power concerns. Kegley's primary intent is to show that neo-realism ignores factors that influence international actors, and that a theory is needed that expands the notion of self-interest to include the moral sphere.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Normative Constraints on the Use of Force Short of WarJournal of Peace Research, 1986
- Can Arms Races Lead to the Outbreak of War?Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1984
- The poverty of neorealismInternational Organization, 1984
- The richness of the tradition of political realismInternational Organization, 1984
- A normative enquiry in international relations: the case of ‘pacta sunt servanda’Review of International Studies, 1983
- Arms Races and EscalationJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1980
- Colouring it Morgenthau: new evidence for an old thesis on quantitative international politicsBritish Journal of International Studies, 1979
- Soviet - American relations: a multiple symmetry modelJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1965
- Christian Attitudes toward War and PeaceReview of Religious Research, 1961
- In Defense of the National Interest; A Critical Examination of American Foreign PolicyThe Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 1951