Rate Hysteresis Pacing: How Valuable Is It? A Comparison of the Stimulation Rates of 70 and 50 Beats per Minute and Rate Hysteresis in Patients with Sinus Node Disease

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The main disadvantages of VVI pacing are absence of acceleration of the heart rate and loss of atrial synchronization. The alternatives to AAI and DDD pacing are stimulation at a low rate or hysteresis in order to decrease pacing time and thus reduce AV asynchrony. Nine patients who suffered from sinus node disease and who had been given a multiprogrammable pacemaker were monitored at each of three stimulation rates: 70, 50, and 70 bpm with an inhibition rate of 50 bpm (hysteresis). The total pacing time was shortest (p less than 0.05) for the stimulation rate of 50 bpm as compared to 70 bpm and hysteresis. It was also shorter for the hysteresis mode than for the 70 bpm mode (p less than 0.05). Only for hysteresis pacing was there a significant reduction in the number of changes from conducted cardiac rhythm to pacemaker-induced rhythm. Most patients found the 50 bpm mode preferable. None favored the hysteresis mode. In patients with sinus node disease and intermittent bradycardia being permanently paced, the periods of AV-conducted rhythm may be lengthened by reducing the stimulation rate from 70 bpm, with or without hysteresis pacing, to 50 bpm. In paced patients with sinus node disease and symptoms due to AV asynchrony, it might be worth trying a decrease in the stimulation rate before resorting to other pacemaker systems.