The Modern Abdominoperineal Excision
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 242 (1) , 74-82
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000167926.60908.15
Abstract
Examine the cause of local recurrence (LR) and patient survival (S) following abdominoperineal resection (APR) and anterior resection (AR) for rectal carcinoma and the effect of introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) on APR. A total of 608 patients underwent surgery for rectal cancer in Leeds from 1986 to 1997. CRM status and follow-up data of local recurrence and patient survival were available for 561 patients, of whom 190 underwent APR (32.4%) and 371 AR (63.3%). Also, a retrospective study of pathologic images of 93 specimens of rectal carcinoma. Patients undergoing APR had a higher LR and lower survival (LR, 22.3% versus 13.5%, P = 0.002; S, 52.3% versus 65.8%, P = 0.003) than AR. LR free rates were lower in the APR group and cancer specific survival was lowered (LR, 66% versus 77%, log rank P = 0.03; S, 48% versus 59%, log rank P = 0.02). Morphometry: total area of surgically removed tissue outside the muscularis propria was smaller in APR specimens (n = 27) than AR specimens (n = 66) (P < 0.0001). Linear dimensions of transverse slices of tissue containing tumor, median posterior, and lateral measurements were smaller (P < 0.05) in the APR than the AR group. APR specimens with histologically positive CRM (n = 11) had a smaller area of tissue outside the muscularis propria (P = 0.04) compared with the CRM-negative APR specimens (n = 16). Incidence of CRM involvement in the APR group (41%) was higher than in the AR group (12%) (P = 0.006) in the 1997 to 2000 cohort. Similar results (36% and 22%) were found in the 1986 to 1997 cohort (P = 0.002). Patients treated by APR have a higher rate of CRM involvement, a higher LR, and poorer prognosis than AR. The frequency of CRM involvement for APR has not diminished with TME. CRM involvement in the APR specimens is related to the removal of less tissue at the level of the tumor in an APR. Where possible, a more radical operation should be considered for all low rectal cancer tumors.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Macroscopic Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Resection Specimen: Clinical Significance of the Pathologist in Quality ControlJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with Total Mesorectal Excision for Resectable Rectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) with or without Preoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary Rectal Cancer: Prospective Randomised Trial with Standard Operative and Histopathological TechniquesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum—An endangered operationDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1997
- Rectal cancer: The surgical optionsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1995
- LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA DUE TO INADEQUATE SURGICAL RESECTIONThe Lancet, 1986
- The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?British Journal of Surgery, 1982
- A Method of Performing Abdomino-Perineal Excision for Carcinoma of the Rectum and of the Terminal Portion of the Pelvic Colon (1908)CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1971
- A METHOD OF PERFORMING ABDOMINO-PERINEAL EXCISION FOR CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM AND OF THE TERMINAL PORTION OF THE PELVIC COLON.The Lancet, 1908