Frequency importance functions for a feature recognition test material
- 31 May 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 83 (6) , 2372-2382
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396316
Abstract
The relative importance of different parts of the auditory spectrum to recognition of the Diagnostic Rhyme Test (DRT) and its six speech feature subtests was determined. Three normal hearing subjects were tested twice in each of 70 experimental conditions. The analytical procedures of French and Steinberg [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 9, 90–119 (1947)] were applied to the data to derive frequency importance functions for each of the DRT subtests and the test as a whole over the frequency range 178–8912 Hz. For the DRT as a whole, the low frequencies were found to be more important than is the case for nonsense syllables. Importance functions for the feature subtests also differed from those for nonsense syllables and from each other as well. These results suggest that test materials loaded with different proportions of particular phonemes have different frequency importance functions. Comparison of the results with those from other studies suggests that importance functions depend to a degree on the available response options as well.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Speech Production of the Hearing ImpairedJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1985
- Speech quality evaluation using ‘‘phoneme-specific’’ sentencesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1985
- Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing- impaired listenersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1985
- An evaluation of some assumptions underlying the articulation indexThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1984
- Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairmentThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1984
- Amplification Bandwidth and Intelligibility of Speech in Quiet and Noise for Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing LossInternational Journal of Audiology, 1983
- Some effects of spectral shaping on recognition of speech by hearing-impaired listenersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1982
- A Comparison of the Effects of Filtering and Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Patterns of Consonant ConfusionsJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1978
- Rhyming Minimal Contrasts: A Simplified Diagnostic Articulation TestThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1967
- The Perception of Speech and Its Relation to TelephonyThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1950